Motions & Appeals

Created in 1985, Sugarman Law Firm’s Motions and Appeals practice group was one of the first of its kind in Upstate New York.

To this day, the experience and expertise of the attorneys in this practice group continues to distinguish Sugarman Law Firm, LLP from most general practice firms in the region.

The Motions and Appeals practice group focuses on appellate practice and complex motion practice, and its attorneys specialize in legal research, legal writing, and oral advocacy.

The attorneys in Sugarman Law Firm’s Motions and Appeals practice group prepare and argue a variety of motions from the commencement of an action through the post-trial phase. The practice group’s familiarity with New York’s Civil Practice Rules and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure make the attorneys in this practice group uniquely suited to represent clients through the intricate steps of state and federal motion practice. The attorneys in the practice group are also familiar with the procedures for commencing and defending special proceedings in New York State Court, including Article 78 proceedings.

  • Motions to dismiss
  • Motions for summary judgment
  • Discovery motions
  • Article 78 proceedings
  • Appeals to the New York State Appellate Division
  • Appeals to the New York State Court of Appeals
  • Appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

The attorneys

The attorneys in this practice group also have extensive experience briefing and arguing civil appeals at both the state and federal levels. They are familiar with the rules of procedure for all of the appellate courts in New York State, and for the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. They use their extensive knowledge of substantive law, and their commitment to learning the facts in the appellate record, to craft persuasive appellate briefs and oral arguments.

Jenna W. Klucsik, Esq.

Cory J. Schoonmaker, Esq.

MARINA A. MURRAY, ESQ.

Notable Cases

Stapleton v. Barrett Crane Design & Engineering

725 Fed. App’x 28 (2d Cir. 2018)

Spring v. Allegany-Limestone Central School District

655 Fed. App’x 25 (2d Cir. 2016)

Lilly v. Town of Lewiston

582 Fed. App’x 55 (2d Cir. 2014)

Marentette v. City of Canandaigua

351 F. Supp. 3d 410 (W.D.N.Y. 2019), and 159 A.D.3d 1410 (4th Dept. 2018)

Candino v. Starpoint Central School District

115 A.D.3d 1170 (4th Dept. 2014), aff’d 24 N.Y.3d 925 (2014)

Cleveland v. Perry

175 A.D.3d 1017 (4th Dept. 2019)

Mecca v. Buffalo Niagara Convention Center Management Corp.

158 A.D.3d 1161 (4th Dept. 2018)

Hastedt v. Bovis Lend Lease Holdings, Inc.

152 A.D.3d 1159 (4th Dept. 2017)

Wittman v. Nice

144 A.D.3d 1675 (4th Dept. 2016)

Litz v. Clinton Central School District

126 A.D.3d 1306 (4th Dept. 2015)

Farruggia v. Town of Penfield

119 A.D.3d 1320 (4th Dept. 2014)

City of Binghamton v. Hawk Engineering, P.C.

85 A.D.3d 1417 (3d Dept. 2011)
Proud Supporter of Make-A-Wish
The information on this site is not legal advice, it is Attorney Advertising intended to educate potential clients about their need for legal advice and assist them in obtaining a lawyer appropriate for those needs. Use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every case is different and every person should consult a lawyer to asses their particular case. If you think our firm can assist you please contact us for a consultation. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.